Annals of History
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 14:40
ANNALS OF HISTORY AND CONTEMPORARY RELEVANT ISSUES
“Know the truth and the truth will set you free”
(John c.8 v.32)
Get rid of dogma alienation keeping updated.
Humanity must know…
- after overcoming a lawsuit of ideological falsehood in Federal Justice that endured for fifteen years, INRI CRISTO obtained the official recognition of his identity by earthly authorities. On October 24th 2000, the Notable Tribunal of Justice in the State of Paraná issued a reverencing sentence determining that the new name of the Son of GOD, INRI CRISTO, was registered in all his documents (passport, ID, CPF, etc.). INRI is the name that cost the price of blood on the cross. It means, in Latin, Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum (Jesus the Nazarene, King of Jews); in Hebrew, Iammim Nour Rouahh Iabescheh (fire, land, water and air); it also means Igne Natura Renovatur Integra: by the fire nature renews (“To whom that wins… will I write upon him the name of my FATHER… and my new name” – Revelation c.3 v.12) and CRISTO (Christ), in the translation of Greek, means “the anointed one”, in the singular (read INRI CRISTO’s complete juridical history in the book called The Time).
- in the occasion of the Libertarian Act perpetrated by INRI CRISTO inside Belem’s cathedral (state of Pará, Brazil) in the historical Feb 28th 1982, a group of psychiatrists officially named by the judge Dr. Jaime dos Santos Rocha examined him and declared that, according to optimist prospects, they could only conclude a laudo about the Son of GOD on the day of Final Judge, alleging that he acts in a superior intellectual sphere considered atípica (as registered the newspaper O Liberal, filed in SOUST).
- a group of program Fantastic, from Globo Networks, specially organized in the Botanic Garden of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), was moved to Belem with the intention of registering all moments of the revolution perpetrated by INRI CRISTO, as to know: the entrance in the cathedral with people, the flagrant of the Libertarian Act, the arrival of policemen, INRI CRISTO’s detention, the statements of prisoners, authorities’ opinion, the visit of Belem’s inhabitants who daily went to Prison São José seeking for blessings, the triumphal departure from jail without depending on lawyers after fifteen days of reclusion, etc. Nevertheless, disparaging the sacred right of Brazilian people to know the truth and demonstrating that democracy and press freedom are utopia in Brazil, Globo Networks showed only the moment of INRI CRISTO’s detention. And taking its place, the “investigative” Veja magazine (March 10th 1982 edition) restricted to show only a slanderous article written by a free-lance.
- the historical Feb. 28th 1982 marked the breaking up with the bond INRI CRISTO had with what remained from his former church, the roman, annulling the effect of the words spoken to Peter: “Peter, you are Peter, and upon this rock I’ll build my church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it” (Matthew c.16 v.18). As he said in the singular, all other churches called Christian lack legitimacy and historical origin. And because the gates of hell started to prevail in the bosom of the whore from Apocalypse c.17 (Inquisition, religious trade, selling of indulgences, sacraments, etc. pedophilia, moral debauchery, political pacts with bloody despotic dictators… ), it was declared proscribed by the ALMIGHTY and in its place the new catholic order came into being, SOUST, which came to give continuity to the Sect of the Nazarene (as Christian church was known in its beginning), in whose bosom were the pure teachings left by the Son of GOD before being crucified.
- on the 6th century emperor Constantine was formally converted to Christianity not as an act of religious faith but as a trick of political skill, as he saw in the growth of Christianity a way to facilitate the expansion of Roman Empire. So he took possession of what remained from primitive Christian church and, against divine will, aiming to transform it in Rome’s ecclesiastic arm, named it catholic apostolic roman church. Catholic, which also means universal in the Greek translation, because the intention of roman empire was to dominate over the Earth; apostolic because it was organized by Constantine’s obedient apostles, not by the disciples of Christ; roman because incorporated the customs, beliefs and rituals of pagan Romans and started to serve the interests of roman State.
- the cults and dogmas of roman church are in their totality a plagiarism very badly disguised of pagan beliefs and rituals. Mass, processions, chants, the cult of Mary, images adoration, the dogma of the physical resurrection of Christ to heaven and even the accounts of miracles, finally, all of this are nothing but merely an adaptation of beliefs, costumes and legends of paganism established in Antiquity.
- the belief in the physical resurrection of Christ to heaven and the cult of Mary in processions date back to the time of pagan celebrations, in other words, they were a way of “Christianizing” the established paganism. The Annals of Hisotry register that in the festival of veneration to Cibele, antique pagan goddess, her worshipers fasted, prayed and sorrowed for the death of her son Átis, pagan god; afterwards the young god was taken to his tumble in solemn procession. On the next day, people celebrated the resurrection of Átis and earth renewal. On the last day of the festival, the image of the “Great Mother” was carried in triumph along the streets and in Rome the multitude greeted her as Nostra Domini, “Our Lady”. Even more adored than Cibele was the Egyptian goddess Isis, considered among the pagans owner of the eternal gift of life. All peoples from the Mediterranean had the belief that her husband Osiris had died and raised from the dead; this “resurrection” was commemorated with imposing processions and chants of joy. In the images of worship, Isis appeared bearing in her arms her “divine” son Horus, and the litanies greeted her as “Queen of Heaven”, “Star of the Sea” and “Mother of god”. From all pagan cults, this was the one that most approached Christianity. From all pagan cults, this was the one that most approached contemporary Catholicism. I other words: roman church shamelessly, impudently substituted the challenge between Cibele and Isis for the veneration to the legion of “mothers of god”, that proliferate according to the demand of customers and fight among themselves the titling for the post (will “Our Lady the Appeared” be the most important “mother of god”? Or will “Our Lady of Lourdes”, intending to seduce the French? Maybe “Our Lady of Guadalupe” or “of Nazareth” deserves to be the most important one…).
- at this same period, to a man called Apolonius (who had an abnegated and merciful life, according to the legend) the tradition started to attribute many miracles, and his followers asserted that after death he appeared to them and physically ascended to heaven. Since there are ones who say Christ in bone and flesh in heaven sat at the right of GOD, and considering that in outer space temperature borders on absolute zero, in other words, 273ºCelsius negative, maybe this Apolonius is frozen there too, but at the left of GOD… Therefore, for those who honestly reason, it’s not so difficult to identify the origin of so many beliefs and fantasies introduced in the bosom of Catholicism during these two thousand years of Christ absence from Earth.
- on the 6th century roman emperor Justinian ordered the suppression of reincarnation from Christian doctrine in obedience to his prostitute wife Theodore. The Annals of History register the true reason that led Theodore to manipulate her husband. First, for having been a prostitute, she wanted to get rid of such shameful past materialized in the voices of her past-colleagues, who bragged about the honor of having her in the court: she determined that all her five hundred ex-colleagues, prostitutes of Constantinople, with no exception, were murdered. The voice of people, resistant to the atrocity, ferociously rose up against Theodore, shouting in front of palace entrance: “Murderer! You must die five hundred times…”, in allusion to the law of return, also known as law of karma, or law of the Talian: “One eye for one eye, one tooth for one tooth… one life for one life” (Exodus c.21 v.23 and 24). In the illusion of being capable to get rid of the consequences of such pernicious act, Theodore took advantage of State authority to interfere in ecclesiastic power; she ordered her obedient husband, the despot emperor Justinian, to suppress from Christian doctrine all what referred to the law of reincarnation, declared heretic in the Second Council of Constantinople, in 553. From then on, any Christian who taught reincarnation would be subject to condemnation. Therefore, the suppression of reincarnation is nothing more than a lamentable historical mistake, without any ecclesiastic validity.
- on the 13th century the most terrible of all Vatican’s stratagems was established – the Inquisition. Approximately 100 million people considered “heretic” suffered the aggravating circumstances of the notorious “Saint Inquisition”. Who dared to go against the spurious determinisms of proscribed roman church and remained faithful to the teachings of Christ and to divine law would be condemned to suffer terrible persecutions: many were murdered, tortured, martyred, burned alive… One of the most elevated mentalities of that time, brother Giordano Bruno, was burned alive for insisting that in the Gospel Christ spoke about reincarnation.
- the origin of Sunday observance by the Christian dates back to year 321, occasion when emperor Constantine, aiming to conciliate paganism with Christianity, promulgated a decree declaring that all his subjects should rest on the “venerable” day of the sun, the “Dies Solis” of pagans, and work on Saturday. So far, Saturday was considered the resting day for the Christians, who kept the forth commandment of GOD’s law expressed in the Holy Scriptures: “Remember to sanctify the Sabbath” (Exodus c.20 v.8). If a Christian were met resting on Saturday, he would be persecuted and excommunicated. And so paganism was more and more introduced into what had remained from the church of Christ…
- the images were introduced in the churches around year 300 of Christian age only with the intention of adorning, deluding the Christians. Afterwards, on the 8th century, the images were turned into an object of cult (adoration) as a means of propitiating a substitution to idols worship to the converted pagans and so promote their nominal acceptance to the Catholicism. However, such practice doesn’t coadunate with the second commandment of the original law of GOD, constant in the Holy Bible: “You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is above in heaven, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth” (Exodus c.20 v.4) / “I am the LORD, your GOD, you shall make for yourselves no idols and erect no carved images or pillars, and you shall not place figures stones in your land, to worship at them; for I am the LORD, you GOD. You shall keep my Sabbaths and reverence my sanctuary…” (Leviticus c.26 v.1 to 30) / “The idol, work of human hands, is accursed, it and its author” (Book of Wisdom c.14 v.8 and 27) / “I am the LORD, that is my name; my glory I give to no other nor my praise to idols” (Isaiah c.42 v.8).
- the Vatican distorted the true revealing of the Third Secret of Fatima as it refers to the end of Catholic church and to Final Judge. Magazine Planet from August 1974 registered some passages of the third secret, which contains too much terrible revelations to achieve public knowledge. “A third world war will come and so horrible that there will be very few survivors over the Earth (…) Grave happenings will come upon human beings. If ecclesiastic organizations don’t radically transform, death will reign in the bosom of the church and the Christians will walk aimlessly, cursing the clergy. It will have arrived the end of “popes” and the last of them will groan with body pain (…) But they won’t find escape. Their throne will fall”. This is the passage that in 1967 would have chocked Paul VI by seeing the chaos would come, and a new church would rise from the catastrophe to receive the survivors of the great hecatomb. Obviously, this new church is SOUST, Suprema Ordem Universal da Santíssima Trindade (Supreme Universal Order of the Holy Trinity), only church of INRI CRISTO, in the formation of only one flock and one shepherd (John c.10 v.4).
- number 666 of the beast of Apocalypse c.13 v.18 (“This calls for wisdom: let anyone with understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a person: this number is 666”) is disguised in the miter of Rome’s beast who is called “pope”, post occupied nowadays by Joseph Hatzinger, or Benedictus XVI, the highest priest of proscribed roman church. By adding up the roman numerals contained in the title VICARIVS FILII DEI, the resulting number will be 666 (V=5, I=1, C=100, A=0, R=0, I=1, V=5, S=0, F=0, I=1, L=50, I=1, I=1, D=500, E=0, I=1, in other words, 500+100+50+5+5+1+1+1+1+1+1= 666 / Letters A, R, S, F, E don’t have representation in roman numerals; therefore, have no value).
- “father” and “pope” are false titles, since INRI CRISTO taught before being crucified: “You shall call no one your father on Earth, for one is your FATHER, which is in heaven” (Matthew c.23 v.9). Priests are called father in English countries and “padre” in Portuguese-speaking countries, whose translation from Italian and Spanish means father, and “pope”, in Portuguese “papa”, in the deformation of Greek and Latin, also means father. Therefore, these titles don’t have any ecclesiastic validity towards the ALMIGHTY.
- the slanders, fantasies, abominable false accusation spoken by Rome’s lackeys against INRI CRISTO have the objective of propitiating organized lack of information; in other words, the fanatical enemies of the truth consider convenient keeping people blind, disoriented, slaved, bewildered by false ideas, unaware of any trace of light that make them awake from such abominable lethargy, such terrible deep sleep. So they proceed always when aim to destruct a popular icon; they try by all means ridicule, distort and denigrate one’s image, as they proceeded two thousand years ago towards the Son of Man with the intention of obtaining the verdict of crucifixion. So also they proceeded towards Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilee when realized their ideas would revolution the established dogmatism, putting in risk the dominating ecclesiastic power. Finally, that was the treatment conceded to all those who dared interfering in the pernicious system established “in name of GOD” for benefit of few. And now, making use of press, they frivolously throw all kind of lies, hasty and unfounded judgments against INRI CRISTO with never conceding him the sacred right of answer. Adapting to the old French proverb: “Slander, slander, slander, something will always remain”, the enemies always and invariably qualify him a deceiver or a lunatic with never propitiating people the merciful benefit of doubt.
- Mary, genitor of Christ two thousand years ago, was a sinner woman like the others, subject to weaknesses and fails inherent to human beings. If she truly was mother of GOD as teaches the proscribed roman church in its spurious prayer (Ave Mary – “saint Mary mother of God”), she would have intimacy with the ALMIGHTY and, consequently, consciousness that time of crucifixion hadn’t arrived. Therefore, she wouldn’t have tried to restrain Christ under the allegation he was out of his mind (“Then he went home, and the crowd came together again, so that they could not even eat. When his family heard it, they went out to restrain him, for they were saying: “He has gone out of his mind” – Mark c.3 v.20 and 21) / “The true kindred of Jesus: then his mother and his brothers came; and standing outside, they sent to him and called him. A crowd was sitting around him; and they said to him: “Your mother and your brothers and sisters are outside, asking for you”. And he replied: “Who are my mother and my brothers?” And looking at those who sat around him, he said: “Here are my mother and my brothers! Whoever does the will of GOD is my brother and sister and mother”).
- it’s impracticable theology study in academy because in academy it’s not possible studying GOD. The so-called academic theologians are nothing but “swindlelogians”, “hoaxlogians”, “deceivelogians” disguised as theologians. The true theology is the knowledge of GOD and the knowledge of GOD can only be obtained through GOD’s revelation. And since Christ said: “I am the light of the world, the truth and the life. No one comes to the FATHER except through me” (John c.14 v.6), how can someone study the undecipherable mysteries of GOD in an academy? Who is the teacher? Who is the master? Who teaches, considering that Christ said two thousand years ago: “Nor are you to be called masters, for you have one Master, the Christ” (Matthew c.23 v.10)? Since the beginning of mankind, the study of GOD’s things only occurs by means of divine revelation, what can occur through prophets or through the Emissary of GOD. Therefore, all the remainders are swindlers, hoaxers, deceivers.
- all science scholars will always come up against GOD’s mysteries. So as paleontologists, archeologists, anthropologists can’t find out Adam’s body and for that reason doubt there had been a First Begotten man, origin of mankind, so too they can’t comprehend the Son of Man INRI CRISTO for not existing parameters; to study the Son of Man, only if there were another Son of Man, as according to scientific-academic optics, only the things that exist physically in series can be studied. Therefore, in the atypical case of the Son of Man, it’s impossible for scientists to study him; only those to whom the ALMIGHTY reveals are granted with knowing and understanding him. In face of that, the psychiatrists, psychologists, neurologists, finally, the scholars on human mind intellectually honest make their judgment only after a personal meeting with INRI CRISTO. Those who proceed in a different way, those who hastily judge without having ever met him face to face deserve to sustain the adjective of charlatan.
- always in all times only the darkness spirits ask for proofs and miracles from the Son of GOD. Two thousand years ago, Herod asked for miracles (Luke c.23 v.8 and 9) and was not answered. Also, the tempter came and said to the Son of GOD: “If you are Christ, command these stones to become loaves of bread. If you are the Son of GOD, throw yourself down, for it is written angels will bear you up… If you are the Son of GOD, I’ll give you the kingdoms of the world if you fall down and worship me” (Matthew c.4 v.1 to 11). Darkness spirits will always be demanding proofs from the Son of Man. Nevertheless, the Son of Man doesn’t need to prove anything to anybody; human beings must prove their dignity towards GOD.
- there’s no paradox when INRI CRISTO says that the Bible is a book of dead words and at the same time makes use of biblical verses and chapters. The same way INRI CRISTO eats fish, shellfish and seaweed from the sea, but does not ingest sand and atomic waste existing deep in the sea, so also he serves from fragments of divine law existing in the Bible and repels mistakes and deceit men inserted in the Bible, including the translation and interpretation mistakes. Behold an irrefutable proof that not everything in the Bible can be considered unquestionably true: GOD is perfect and, being perfect, He doesn’t commit mistake, doesn’t fail; consequently, He doesn’t repent from His works. However, in the Bible it is written that GOD had repented for having created man and for having spread the great flood over the Earth (Genesis c.6 v.6 and c.8 v.21). Therefore, for those who reason lucidly and honestly, this is the enough and irrefutable proof that in the Bible only what really came from GOD must be taken in account and what is subject to human mistake must be questioned. The sensible reader, inspired by GOD, will know to distinguish when is facing a fable, a legend or a parable and will assimilate the meaning of each message considering the cabalistic context.
- when occurred the releasing of the film The Passion of Christ, directed by Mel Gibson, whose plot clearly characterized the intention of blaming Jewish people for the charge of crucifixion, countless journalists and internauts questioned INRI CRISTO’s opinion and how far the director’s opinion was according to the reality. INRI CRISTO exempted Jewish people for the blame, not only for being circumcised, the same Jewish who had been crucified, but because by coolly analyzing the history of humanity, the true blame is and has always been Rome’s. At that time Palestine was under domination of Roman Empire. The Jewish had neither authority nor governmental power to decree the execution. The leadership of priests, allied to the governor, incited people to behave in mass. Pontius Pilate, charged by roman emperor with responsibility to govern over Judea, was who detained political power. Therefore, following the logic of impartial reasoning, it’s an injustice attributing to Jewish people the guilt, which falls exclusively to Rome.
